Port of Savannah to increase containership handling capacity

THE board of Georgia Ports Authority has approved a plan to renovate and realign the docks in the port of Savannah’s ocean terminal to better accommodate the port’s growing box volumes.

The terminal handles breakbulk and containers, and the transformation is part of a broader effort to turn it into a container-only operation.

The depot will continue containership and breakbulk operations during construction, said GPA chief operating officer Ed McCarthy.

The docks will be rebuilt to provide an additional 2,800 linear feet of berth space that could handle two 16,000 teu containerships simultaneously, which will be served by new ship-to-shore cranes.

The GPA plans to shift most breakbulk operations to the port of Brunswick, where construction has started on 360,00 sq ft of dockside warehousing, according to executive director Griff Lynch.

“Completion of this project will improve our flexibility and allow Georgia Ports to optimise cargo movement, supporting our customers in delivering goods to market efficiently,” he added.

Overall, the project “will bring expanded gate facilities and paving to allow for 1.5m twenty-foot equivalent units of annual capacity,” according to the statement.

The port of Savannah has grown tremendously over the past two years during the pandemic-induced import boom. It handled almost 20% more cargo in 2021 than in 2020, and has grown an additional 7.2% so far this year compared with the year earlier period. Volumes were further buoyed this year by the labour dispute on the west coast that led many disruption-wary shippers to divert their cargo eastwards.

The port logged its busiest month on record in August, handling 575,513 teu, while October (552,800 teu) and July (530,800 teu) were its second and third busiest months, respectively.

The increase in volumes has created a vessel backlog that hovered over 35 boxships during summer, and while it has come down significantly from those highs, Lloyd’s List Intelligence data shows that there were still 23 ships at anchor as of Monday afternoon, the most of any US port.

Port officials expect that volumes will ease as the year ends, and Mr Lynch said that the opening of a new container berth at the port’s Garden City terminal next summer coupled with the declining volumes will help expedite vessel service.

“While we are beginning to see an anticipated market correction, it is important that GPA move forward with projects like the ocean terminal enhancements to accommodate business growth,” said GPA board chairman Joel Wooten. “Through continued infrastructure improvement, we will ensure the free flow of commerce, and our ability to meet expanding customer demand.”

The GPA board has approved $1.17bn in infrastructure investments over the past year, according to the statement.

Source: The Lloyd’s List

2M split may be on the horizon as tonnage-rich MSC prepares to go it alone

Since August 2020, MSC’s brokers have completed the acquisition of nearly 250 second-hand containerships to usurp 2M partner Maersk as the biggest ocean carrier in capacity terms, suggesting the alliance deal may not be renewed when it expires in April 2024.

According to Alphaliner data, the Geneva-headquartered carrier currently operates 709 vessels, for a capacity of 4.6m teu, compared with Maersk’s 711 ships and 4.3m teu.

However, MSC has a massive orderbook, of 1.75m teu (equivalent to the fleet of fifth-ranked carrier Hapag-Lloyd), while Maersk has just 374,000 teu of capacity on order.

S&P brokers told The Loadstar MSC was by far the “most aggressive” carrier during the peak of the second-hand tonnage boom, with only CMA CGM’s 85 or so acquisitions threatening its monopoly of the buyer’s market.

MSC said its aim was to be less dependent on the charter market for its growth aspirations and, following the vessel acquisitions, its owned tonnage was up to 45% of its fleet – albeit not as high as Maersk’s 60%, or Hapag-Lloyd’s 62%.

Moreover, the range of purchases by the carrier – from ULCVs down to feeder vessels of 2,500 teu and below – supports its strategy of taking control of more of its vessel operations rather than using slot-charter swaps or using commercial feeder operators for hub-and-spoke relays.

Many of MSC’s vessel purchases were made when daily charter hire rates were skyrocketing and owners were trying to lock-in deals at highly elevated rates for minimum two-year periods.

Consequently, the asset values of the ships soared and, although MSC secured second-hand tonnage at the start of its buying spree at bargain rates (before their values caught up with their earnings potential on the charter market), during the peak of the market they were obliged to pay top dollar to secure purchases.

For example, in September last year, MSC paid $68m for the 2005-built 5,042 teu CSL Santa Maria which, according to Vesselsvalue, is now worth just $30m.

And in November 2021, the carrier acquired one of Sea Consortium’s largest ships, the 2014-built 4,896 teu X-Press Jersey for an eyewatering $105m. The feeder specialist had acquired it two years earlier for $27m – and, according to Vesselsvalue, it is now worth $48m.

Nevertheless, the declines all represent paper losses, as MSC is unlikely to sell the ships it acquired during the S&P raids and, furthermore, does not have to answer to public shareholders. But the vast tonnage it acquired during the demand peak will now challenge its vessel management staff as they seek to redeploy surplus tonnage.

Furthermore, the delivery of the vast 1.75m teu of newbuild tonnage over the next few years will surely mean MSC will need to operate on a standalone basis after its 2M agreement with Maersk ends.

Indeed, a carrier contact from another alliance The Loadstar spoke to recently was convinced there would be, as he put it, “another game of musical chairs” among the lines, as the industry returns to a pre-pandemic, unit cost-driven ‘new normal’.

“You are only as good as your last month’s voyage results,” he said, “and VSA partners will all be looking to work with the lines that have less exposure to the downturn,” he added.

Source: Theloadstar

Decaying demand sees China’s ports building empty container mountains

Amid a “very quiet” end-of-year shipping season, empty containers are piling up at Chinese ports.

According to Alice Tang, China-Europe land transport planner at ITS Cargo, there has been a complete reversal of the severe equipment shortages of last year’s pandemic-induced cargo boom.

“Empty containers are piling up at ports including Guangzhou, Yantian, and Shekou,” she told The Loadstar.

“Some say they are already piling up on roads, while others say 90% of box spaces are occupied. Trailer drivers used to bring loaded containers to the terminal and pick up empty containers for the next load. Now, most of the drivers no longer pick up empty containers because there is no ‘next shipment’.

“Last year, forwarders were standing in a queue for the whole night to fight for an empty container, and joking that containers were probably worth more than their weight in gold.”

Ms Tang said Q4 had been “very quiet” and rates were “so low”, compared with 2021.

“We’ve been quoted $1,550 per feu from Shanghai to Gdansk, and less than $1,000 per teu for other China-Europe lanes. Lots of people are coming to ask me whether we have goods to ship.”

According to Linerlytica, freight rates from the Far East to Europe, the Middle East and Africa have continued their downward spiral and suffered the sharpest falls last week, amid “volume weakness across all tradelanes”.

The analyst added: “Carriers are pushing for a new round of general rate increases in December, but they are unlikely to succeed if surplus capacity is not removed. Contract rates for the 2023 season appear certain to fall by as much as 80%, as they mirror the drop in spot rates. The SCFI is already down by 73%, year on year.

“Although charter rates appear to have settled over the past week, there is still excess supply, with an abundance of sublet units available from carriers that are stuck with surplus tonnage. More ships to enter lay-up have appeared, with Matson and Pasha already mothballing their ships.”

Meanwhile, Ms Tang said congestion at European warehouses was also a challenge, explaining: “For e-commerce goods, unloading is hard as there are limited available slots in EU warehouses. They’re all full, as retailers increased stock earlier in the year because they were afraid of disruptions and delays.

“But now they cannot sell it all, as consumers reduced spending on shopping this year. Even Q1 next year may not be good.”

Source: theloadstar

CMA CGM shores up finances ahead of downturn

Carrier has paid down its debt and invested in sectors adjacent to its shipping concerns. Warns that inflationary environment is clouding outlook for economic growth

CMA CGM expects to see a faster return to more normal freight rates in the fourth quarter and lower margins as geopolitical tensions reduce demand and increase its costs.

To mitigate this, the company has made significant inroads into its debt repayments while strengthening its shipping, ports, logistics and air freight capabilities.

The third quarter had already been shaped by “persistent geopolitical tensions” that had spurred higher inflation and dragged down consumer spending, which was already moving returning to higher services spending following the pandemic, the company said in its third-quarter results.

“The group was also impacted by the unstable geopolitical situation, specifically by the increase in unit bunker costs driven by higher energy prices,” CMA CGM said.

“On a like-for-like fuel consumption basis, these higher energy prices led to a year-over-year increase of $822m in bunker costs in the third quarter of 2022. The slowdown in shipping demand pushed down spot freight rates, particularly on main east-west routes.”

Group revenues were up 30% year on year to $19.9bn in the third quarter, but higher costs meant that operating earnings were down 4.6% from the previous quarter at $9.2bn. Net profit of $7.04bn fell by $563m when compared with the corresponding quarter of 2021.

But the group continued to strengthen its balance sheet. Net debt fell $5.3bn during the quarter to just $78m.

“The CMA CGM group once again recorded strong results in the third quarter,” said chief executive Rodolphe Saadé. “Over the past two years, we have significantly strengthened our financial structure and developed our business through the entire supply chain.”

Declining demand had prompted a return to “more normal” international trade flows and a significant reduction in freight rates, he added.

“In this new environment, we will continue to invest to strengthen our positioning in maritime shipping and logistics, accelerate our energy transition and provide our clients with even more efficient solutions.”

CMA CGM said that a number of acquisitions since the start of the year, including that of Gefco, which was approved by competition authorities during the third quarter, had helped strengthen its Ceva Logistics subsidiary.

Revenues in its logistics division were up by over 50% to $4.4bn from the corresponding quarter of 2021.

It had also boosted its terminals portfolio during the quarter, with the joint-venture tender win for the privatisation of the Nhava Sheva terminal in India, while its CMA CGM Air Cargo business had launched its Paris-Hong Kong service following the delivery of its first two new Boeing 777 freighters.

CMA CGM’s full-year results will likely set another record for the company, but the outlook for the following years is definitely less optimistic now.

“The health crisis and the shifting consumer spending patterns that drove strong demand during lockdowns have placed unprecedented strain on the world’s supply chains,” it said.

“These strains are tending to subside in the wake of recent developments in world trade, reflecting a much more uncertain economic environment, which is being deeply affected by geopolitical tensions.”

Source: The Lloyd’s List

Boxship backlog cleared at Los Angeles and Long Beach ports

THE containership backlog at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach has petered out after more than two years, bringing an end to one of the most recognisable features of the pandemic-era supply chain crises.

No vessels were backed up at the San Pedro Bay ports on November 21 for the first day since October 2020, according to Kip Louttit, executive director of the Southern California Marine Exchange.

The backlog reached 42 ships in February 2021 before dropping to nine in June 2021 and then peaking in January this year.

“After 25 months, and with concurrence of the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, the Pacific Maritime Association, and the Pacific Merchant Shipping Association, the container ship backup for the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach has ended,” said Mr Louttit.

The ports have enough labour to handle current volumes and ocean carriers are sometimes delaying vessel arrivals to optimise their operations. It is therefore “time to move into a different phase of operations and declare that the backup has ended,” he said.

The boxship backlog reached a high of 109 vessels this January, removing fleet capacity and sending freight rates skyrocketing in the process, while also causing long delays in deliveries of goods to consumers.

The mounting congestion and protracted labour negotiations between west coast dockworkers and their employers led many shippers to divert their cargo to east and gulf coast ports, shifting much of the backlogs to their anchorages and terminals instead.

As US import volumes slow, those backlogs are also easing, but are still far from resolved.

The ports of Virginia, Savannah, and Houston had a combined total of 40 containerships at anchor on Tuesday night, Lloyd’s List Intelligence data show, of which 27 were in Savannah.

Source: Lloyd’s List

2M suspends USEC service as rates, volumes drop near year’s end

Mediterranean Shipping Co. (MSC) and Maersk are halting a trans-Pacific US East Coast service after freight rates have been cut by more than half from the summer peak.

MSC and Maersk, partners in the 2M Alliance, said in separate statements this week that they will temporarily suspend their jointly run Liberty/TP23 service until further notice, adding that the suspension “will help alleviate port congestion.” The last sailing will be Nov. 23 from Indonesia. Liberty/TP23, which was introduced in March 2021, offers service from Indonesia, Vietnam and China to the US ports of Charleston, Savannah, and New York-New Jersey with a string of ships in the 8,000 TEU range.

The service suspension comes as rates into the US East Coast see further weakening as the end of 2022 nears. After dropping about 25 percent from October, average US East Coast freight rates now sit at $4,500 per FEU, with bookings done as low as $3,700, according to a trans-Pacific forwarder who asked not to be identified. That is down 55 percent from levels seen in June, the forwarder added.

“Ocean carriers are cutting rates and voiding sailings left, right, and center,” the source said.

With rates returning to pre-pandemic levels, ship supply to the US East Coast appears too high to offset rate declines. Sea-Intelligence Maritime Analysis said in its most recent Sunday Spotlight newsletter that November vessel capacity into the USEC is 19.5 percent above the level seen in November 2019, with December capacity running even higher at 37.7 percent above the same month in 2019.

Meanwhile, more service changes could be coming. MSC’s standalone Santana service, which was shifted from a West Coast to an East Coast service last year, is reportedly moving to every three weeks instead of a weekly service, according to a maritime shipping source who did not want to be identified. The service change could not be independently verified.

Some of the slowdown in container activity is showing up in the most recently available cargo figures for New York-New Jersey. Although New York-New Jersey has been the busiest US port for three consecutive months, the October volume of 792,548 TEU was essentially flat with the year-ago month. In a statement to JOC.com, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey said it forecasts full-year 2022 volume to be about 9 million TEU, which would be up only nominally from 2021.

Source: JOC news

ILWU halts vessel operations at Oakland’s largest terminal

Members of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) shut down vessel operations at the Oakland International Container Terminal (OICT) Monday in the latest West Coast port disruption to occur amid longshore contract talks that have now dragged on for more than six months.

A source with knowledge of Oakland’s operations who asked not to be identified said ILWU workers “red-tagged” equipment inside OICT early Monday, meaning none of the equipment could be used until inspected by a mechanic. The source called the move a “gimmick” that forced the loading and unloading of all vessels at the terminal to come to a halt. As of 2:30 pm West Coast time Monday, operations had not resumed, and it was unclear how long the disruption would last.

OICT is the busiest marine terminal at the Port of Oakland, handling about 70 percent of its container volume.

The latest disruption at Oakland comes just two weeks after three of the port’s four terminals were shut down for a morning shift after ILWU marine clerks picketed over a travel pay issue.

The first source and a second source also with knowledge of Oakland’s operations called Monday’s action by the ILWU an obvious attempt to exert pressure on contract negotiations with the Pacific Maritime Association (PMA) that show no sign of reaching a resolution anytime soon. Talks began in May but have been stalled for months and all but suspended since October

The prior contract between the ILWU and PMA, which represents marine terminal operators and ocean carriers, expired on July 1.

OICT is operated by SSA Containers, the same operator that runs Terminal 5 at the Port of Seattle, which has been the site of a work jurisdictional dispute that has forced the broader West Coast contract talks to be put on hold.

While negotiations on a new deal drag, wary shippers seeking to avoid the type of disruption that halted vessel operations at OICT Monday are diverting an increasing amount of cargo from the West Coast to the East and Gulf coasts.

The West Coast’s market share of US imports from Asia fell to 57.5 percent through the first nine months of the year, down from 61.2 percent in the same period last year. The share for East Coast ports increased to 35.1 percent from 32.8 percent, while the Gulf Coast’s share ticked up to 7.1 percent from 5.7 percent, according to PIERS, a JOC.com sister product within S&P Global.

Source: Journal of Commerce

Cargo Shipowners Cancel Sailings as Global Trade Flips From Backlogs to Empty Containers

Dozens of sailings from Asia to U.S. ports are set to be canceled in October as deteriorating economic conditions weigh on demand to ship goods worldwide

Ocean carriers are canceling dozens of sailings on the world’s busiest routes during what is normally their peak season, the latest sign of the economic whiplash hitting companies as inflation weighs on global trade and consumer spending.

The October cancellations are a sharp reversal from just a few months ago, when scarce shipping space pushed freight rates higher and carriers’ profits to record levels. Last October, companies like Walmart Inc. and Home Depot Inc. were chartering their own ships to get around bottlenecks at ports to meet a surge in demand for imports.

Trans-Pacific shipping rates have plummeted roughly 75% from year-ago levels. The transportation industry is grappling with weaker demand as big retailers cancel orders with vendors and step up efforts to cut inventories. FedEx Corp. recently said it would cancel flights and park cargo planes because of a sharp drop in shipping volumes. On Thursday, Nike Inc. said it was sitting on 65% more inventory in North America than a year earlier and would resort to markdowns.

The erosion in global economic conditions, from the war in Ukraine to factory shutdowns in China, have dealt heavy blows to trade activity. The International Monetary Fund has cut its forecast for global growth in gross domestic product multiple times this year. Consumer prices are rising at the fastest rates in years in the U.S., countries in Europe and other parts of the world.

One response to the melting demand has been to reduce sailing trips. In September, container capacity offered by ship operators in the Pacific was down 13%, dropping the equivalent of 21 ships that can each move 8,000 containers in a single voyage, from a year earlier, according to shipping-data providers Xeneta and Sea-Intelligence.

For the two weeks starting Oct. 3, a total of about 40 scheduled sailings to the U.S. West Coast from Asia and 21 sailings to the East Coast from Asia have been scrapped, according to the data companies as well as customer advisories viewed by The Wall Street Journal. Typically at this time of year, an average of two to four sailings a week are blanked, the industry’s term for canceled sailings.

Carriers also are increasingly canceling trips along key Asia-to-Europe routes, the data providers said.

“In the first week of October, one-third of previously announced capacity will be blanked and for the second week, it will be around half,” said Peter Sand, chief analyst at Xeneta. “The downturn pace in recent weeks has been very fast and it looks like carriers misread the low volumes of a nonexistent peak season.”

The period between late summer and early fall typically is the busiest time of year for the largest carriers, as retailers and other importers build inventories ahead of the holiday shopping season.

Daily freight rates now average $3,900 to move a single container across the Pacific, compared with$14,500 at the start of the year and more than $19,000 in 2021, according to the Freightos Baltic Index.

Mediterranean Shipping Co., the world’s largest container carrier by capacity, has voided some sailings recently, including a six-ship service from China to Los Angeles and Long Beach.

The rotation, which MSC operated in alliance with A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S, was suspended “due to significantly reduced demand for shipments into the U.S. West Coast during the past weeks,” according to a customer notice posted Wednesday on MSC’s website. The suspension will remove nearly 12,000 containers a week in capacity from the trans-Pacific trade, and the action would help strengthen the transit times it offers, MSC said in its notice.

MSC declined to comment beyond the notice as did a Maersk spokesman. A Hapag-Lloyd AG spokesman said the company hasn’t canceled sailings as a result of weaker demand. Cosco Shipping Holding Co. and CMA CGM, two other major container operators, didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Some carriers are reluctant to share details on canceled sailings to avoid showing competitors what is happening in their network. Voyages can be scrapped because of port congestion, scheduling issues or falling demand.

Consumer spending on bulky items like furniture and appliances that are often imported into the U.S. has cooled in recent months, according to government data. Such items were in hot demand earlier in the pandemic as Americans spent more time at home and renovated their houses.

A  flotilla of new container ships under order will add capacity over the next two years, meaning that freight rates could come under more pressure as more ship space becomes available.

Ocean container capacity is slated to increase 4% this year and is expected to rise by 8.8% in 2023 and a further 9.7% in 2024, according to London-based shipping adviser Braemar PLC. Since early 2020 some 1,056 ships that can move about eight million boxes were ordered, compared with 688 vessels ordered from 2015 to 2019 that can move around five million boxes.

“The global economy has thrown a few curveballs this year, and our outlook on future demand is uncertain and tepid,” said Jonathan Roach, a container analyst at Braemar. “Overcapacity will likely become an issue from the middle of 2023 through to 2024 and potentially beyond.”

Overcapacity pushes operators to undercut each other, putting pressure on freight rates. Boxship operators fought deep losses for nearly a decade starting in 2008, which prompted consolidation in the industry. The top six ocean-freight carriers move more than 70% of all containers worldwide.

Freight rates on key shipping routes remain above prepandemic levels, and the largest operators have plenty of cash to weather a near-term economic downturn. The costs carriers face are rising, too. Bunker fuel prices, which have cooled since hitting records this summer, are above their late 2019 levels. Port operators are also charging more for ships to dock, passing along the higher energy prices they are facing to the carriers.

“The cost of electricity, particularly in Europe, is significant because the cranes and other heavy equipment run on electrical power,” said Tiemen Meester, chief operating officer for ports and terminals at DP World, a Dubai-based operator of terminals in ports worldwide.

Source: The Wall Street Journal

Carriers consider laying-up box ships as blanking fails to prop up rates

The idled containership fleet has breached the 1m teu capacity milestone – and is set to jump significantly higher as carriers prepare to temporarily suspend services rather than blank sailings

According to Alphaliner, as of 24 October, the number of inactive containerships either in drydock or seeking employment had reached 284, for a capacity of 1.2m teu, representing 4.6% of the global cellular fleet.

At the peak of demand in February, as carriers squeezed the charter market dry in pursuit of every serviceable vessel, the consultant recorded 154 ships, for a capacity of 442,000 teu, as inactive, many in drydock, representing just 1.8% of the global fleet, .

“Weakening cargo demand and declining freight rates have prompted carriers to cull some sailings and even temporarily suspend a number of services on major east-west tradelanes,” said Alphaliner.

The Loadstar has seen a big uptick in the number of blank sailing advisories from Asia-Europe and transpacific carriers in the past two weeks, with, for instance, some Asia-North Europe loops being voided in consecutive weeks.

However, Alphaliner does not count a ship as inactive unless it has been idle for more than 14 days – hence the proliferation of blank sailings does not figure in the capacity surplus analysis.

During Maersk’s Q3 earnings call yesterday, CEO Soren Skou reiterated the carrier’s strategy to “take out capacity to meet demand”, as the group recorded a year-on-year 7.6% decline in liftings against a downgraded market contraction for 2022 of 2%-4%.

The speed of the decline in exports from China has made the reactive blanking strategies of carriers ineffective at halting the erosion of spot and short-term rates, and more radical capacity reduction plans will be necessary to avoid a collapse in contract rates.

The Loadstar understands that some of the partners in the three east-west alliances are calling for their networks to adopt ‘winter programmes’ until mid-January, ahead of the Chinese New Year holiday.

“Nobody wants to be the first to cut out a loop and potentially lose market share,” one carrier contact told The Loadstar.

“There are hawks that want radical action and doves that want to carry on blanking, but everybody is suffering, that’s for sure, and getting concerned about next year,” he said.

Meanwhile, on the containership charter market, the increase in surplus open tonnage is putting more downward pressure on daily hire rates and materially reducing durations.

“Charter rates have continued to weaken for classic panamaxes of 4,000-5,300 teu in the past two weeks, with fixtures now typically concluded for periods of six months at a low-mid $20,000 a day,” said Alphaliner.

In fact, a broker source said this week, owners were now prepared to entertain much lower time-charter periods.

“We are talking with owners and charterers on some ships about extensions of 30 to 45 days, and for new fixtures three to four months,” he said.

Alphaliner noted that a daily hire rate of $20,000 for a panamax was “still decent by historical standards”, but was “ten times lower than what owners could achieve in early 2022”.

Source: THE LOADSTAR

Frustrated shippers caught in Canadian rail congestion call for help

Predictions that congestion at rail yards in Canada’s interior would ease this month and next are not playing out so far, prompting frustrated importers and forwarders to ask for government intervention.

The problems are most pronounced at rail hubs around Toronto and Montreal.

“The Montreal rail terminal situation is still bad to very bad,” reported Karl-Heinz Legler, general manager of Rutherford Global Logistics, adding that the forwarder’s Toronto office describes the situation there as even worse.

Truckers have waited up to nine hours to collect cargo in Montreal, sometimes arriving at the terminal having been told containers are available, only to find they are still on the rail cars, he said.

Congestion disrupted intermodal flows to Canada’s large markets throughout the summer. Industry executives predicted improvement in autumn but this has failed to materialise so far, despite a decline in waterborne imports from Asia.

According to one forwarder, Canadian Pacific has initiated an embargo for containers from the west coast to Montreal for most of the last week of November.

In August, Canadian National (CN) set up relief container yards around Toronto and Montreal, pledging to move boxes as close as possible to their destinations, and charged customers shuttle fees ranging from $300 to $550.

According to the Canadian International Freight Forwarders Association (CIFFA), the situation has been exacerbated by government efforts to help reduce congestion at west coast container gateways (notably Vancouver), which only served to push the problem to inland rail facilities already struggling to cope with volumes.

Now, forwarders and importers are looking to the authorities for help to fix the problem. Bruce Rodgers, executive director of CIFFA, has asked federal agencies like Transport Canada and the Canada Border Services Agency to help.

“Recent decisions by government to clear the backlog at the Pacific gateway only resulted in a worsening situation. Without foresight, decisions were made, not to work on a solution to the problem, but to shift the burden inland.”

Trucking interest groups have also called for government intervention.

Flows from the port of Vancouver have suffered several massive disruptions from severe weather over the past couple of years, which prompted Ottawa to set up a task force to address supply chain issues.

Transport Canada released a report on supply chain problems in early October, in which it suggested policies – from addressing the labour shortage to supply chain data flow and digitisation – and also proposed the creation of a supply chain office to concentrate Ottawa’s approach to transport issues.

Industry bodies have welcomed the recommendations, but companies argue there is a need for immediate measures to deal with current issues. Their frustration with lack of improvement in supply chain flows is aggravated by storage charges levied by the rail companies.

“Trucking companies have no choice but to pass on increased operating costs and have to refuse, in many instances, container haulage because their equipment is tied up at terminals,” said Mr Legler.

“Freight forwarders often get stuck between clients refusing to pay extra charges beyond their control and there are horror stories of uncollectable charges for some, exceeding C$100,000 (US$73,484),” he added.

According to forwarders, the rail companies have not shown any leniency on those charges, a stance that angers importers and forwarders in light of the railways’ profits. CN tabled record results for the third quarter on 25 October reporting a 26% increase in revenue and a 44% surge in operating profit.

Source: THE LOADSTAR