MSC suspends two US services, rejigs others as tariffs hit Chinese imports

Mediterranean Shipping Co. has halted two services from China to the US and revamped other container services to the East and Gulf coasts as the Trump administration’s tariffs against Beijing continue to weaken freight demand.

The world’s largest shipping company said in an advisory Wednesday the service suspensions and network changes were “in response to the recent changes in demand for cargo transport from Asia to the US.”

Following the Trump administration’s imposition of 145% tariffs on most Chinese imports, ocean carriers reported seeing container volumes drop by one-third. Hapag-Lloyd and US-based Matson both said volumes out of China dropped 30% after April 9 when the new China tariffs went into effect.

The affected MSC services are all part of the carrier’s 2025 network following the dissolution of the 2M Alliance with Maersk. In place of Maersk, Zim Integrated Shipping Services has signed on to share vessel space and charter slots on some of MSC’s Asia-US routes.

The suspensions include the Empire service, which calls three of China’s largest ports and the East Coast ports of New York and New Jersey, Norfolk and Baltimore. The service provided 11,500 TEUs in weekly capacity, according to a report from Hong Kong-based logistics provider Honour Lane Shipping.

MSC will also suspend the Pelican service from the Chinese ports of Xiamen and Yantian, along with Vietnam’s Vung Tau and South Korea’s Busan, and calling the Gulf Coast ports of Houston, Mobile and Tampa. Honour Lane said the Pelican service provides weekly capacity ranging between 6,500 and 8,500 TEUs.

Boost SE Asia coverage

The two service suspensions coincide with other interim changes by MSC taking effect this week on four other services that will increase port coverage of Southeast Asia and fill in coverage gaps.

The America service from Asia to the US East Coast will stop calling China’s Yantian port, MSC said, while adding a westbound call at Vietnam’s Haiphong port and an eastbound call at the Port of Colombo in Sri Lanka. The service will also add East Coast calls at the ports of Savannah and Jacksonville, while dropping a call to Norfolk.

The Amberjack service from China to the US Southeast will drop a call at China’s Nansha port but keep calling other major Chinese ports. Likewise, the Amberjack’s US rotation will now make its first two calls at the ports of New York-New Jersey and Baltimore and drop service to the Port of Wilmington, North Carolina.

MSC’s Emerald service will add an outbound call at Taiwan’s Kaohsiung port. The service’s US leg will stop calling Jacksonville and Baltimore but add calls to Norfolk and Boston.

The Lone Star service from Asia to the Gulf Coast will add a call at China’s Yantian port, along with adding calls to Singapore and Vung Tau. The service’s US rotation will drop a call at the Port of New Orleans.

The MSC suspensions, among the first big ones to hit the East and Gulf coasts, follow similar steps for West Coast services that are also heavily exposed to Chinese freight. Alphaliner reported Tuesday that MSC also suspended its Orient service to Long Beach, while OOCL suspended its Pacific South China Express service to Long Beach.

Source: The JOC news

No end to the congestion choking gateway ports in North Europe

North Europe’s largest port gateways are continuing to struggle with persistent congestion that has delayed vessels and hampered container operations at the hubs for months.

Full container yards, labor unrest, staff shortages and changing carrier alliance networks are among the challenges being piled on top of a steady inbound volume from Asia.

A national strike in Belgium on April 29, the fourth strike in the country within the past few months, shut down the Port of Antwerp for the day as workers from the private and public sectors protested recent budget cuts made by the federal government.

There were 19 vessels waiting to depart from Antwerp on Thursday and 20 waiting to enter the port. SeaExplorer noted that already congested yards there have seen a seven-day average vessel waiting time of about 2.19 days; Scan Global put the seven-day waiting time in Antwerp as high as seven days.

Low-water advisory hampers inland shipping

Labor shortages at Rotterdam because of national holidays are impacting container operations at the port, according to SeaExplorer, with vessels waiting for more than a day to berth. Intermodal operator Contargo told customers in an advisory Wednesday that average waiting times for the handling of barges were 71 hours in Rotterdam and 101 hours in Antwerp.

A low-water advisory is also in place on the Rhine River, limiting the volume that can be carried by barges on Europe’s largest inland waterway connecting the industrial heartland of southern Germany to Rotterdam and Antwerp.

Container delivery restrictions were imposed by Hamburg’s main terminal operator HHLA in April to tackle yard congestion. Vessel waiting times at Hamburg are currently up to five days, according to Scan Global.

On top of ships being delayed in Hamburg, rail shipments are taking up to 10 hours to process and disrupting all terminals in the port.

In France, the Port of Le Havre is struggling to catch up with container backlogs following several strikes held in April, while the UK ports of Felixstowe and Southampton are also experiencing lengthy vessel delays.

Details please refer to the JOC news.

Source: The JOC news

Scaled back USTR port tariff to hit Chinese carriers hardest

The US Trade Representative (USTR) has narrowed the scope of its tariffs against China’s maritime industry to a fee based on the cargo capacity or container volume of Chinese-operated and -built ships entering US ports. The more targeted actions follow industry warnings that earlier proposals would increase costs for US shippers and pose an existential threat to smaller ports, but China-based ocean carriers could still face millions in fees under the tariffs.

In its list of tariff actions that take effect Oct. 14, the USTR said Chinese ocean carriers will be subject to a fee of $50 per net ton of capacity upon arrival at a US port. The fee will go up to $80 after one year, rising each year before topping out at $140 in 2028.

Net tonnage measures a ship’s overall cargo capacity, regardless of vessel type. The fee will only be charged at the first port of call on a vessel string and will not stack on top of other port calls. The fee will only be charged five times per year on each vessel.

Ocean carriers based outside of China operating Chinese-built ships will face a fee based on either net tonnage or container volume, whichever is higher. Ships built in other countries will not face the same fees, nor will fees be assessed based on the percentage of Chinese-built ships in a carrier’s fleet or orders at Chinese shipyards.

The tonnage fee for non-Chinese carriers starts at $18, escalating to $23 by April 2026 and topping out at $33 in 2028. The per-container fee starts at $120 and rises to $153 next year and $250 in 2028.

Non-Chinese ocean carriers will be able to waive the fee if they take delivery of a US-built ship of at least the same size within three years. The fees will not apply to Chinese-built ships in US-flag fleets, container ships that are 4,000 TEUs or smaller, voyages of less than 2,000 nautical miles or Chinese-built ships owned by US-based carriers.

The capacity-based tariffs come after a series of proposals that included fees of up to $1.5 million based on US port calls by Chinese carriers and similar fees on non-Chinese ocean carriers with Chinese-built ships in their fleets and orders at Chinese shipyards. Other proposals included an export cargo preference for US-built ships.

After two days of hearings, the USTR said it wanted to reduce the potential impact on US shippers, particularly exporters and dry-bulk shippers.

Still, the USTR plans tariffs based on the capacity of China-built ships and will still charge fees on that country’s ocean carriers. The goal of the fees is “to further disincentivize use of Chinese shipping services,” the USTR said.

Cosco, OOCL in crosshairs

The USTR’s fees will have the largest impact on ships operated by Cosco Shipping and its subsidiary Orient Overseas Container Line (OOCL).

Source: JOC

Vancouver still dealing with extended rail container dwell times

Challenged by severe winter weather in the Canadian interior and a backlog of containers from longshore labor disruption in late 2024, marine terminal operators at the Port of Vancouver continue to grapple with a problem that seems ever-present: extended dwell times for containers moving inland by rail.

Railroads normally run fewer, shorter trains during Canadian winters, but this season’s weather restrictions were more severe than usual, which has caused eastbound containers to pile up on the docks over the past three months.

“Inclement weather across much of Canada in February, including a deep freeze in the prairies and a severe snowstorm in Ontario, affected rail turnaround times and reduced railcar availability on the West Coast,” a spokesperson for the Port of Vancouver told the Journal of Commerce.

“Shorter trains mean more people and equipment are required to move the same amount of goods,” a spokesperson for Canadian National Railway (CN) said.

The average rail container dwell time in March at Vancouver’s four container terminals was 7.7 days. While that was marginally down from 8.5 days in February and 8.3 days in January, according to port statistics, it’s well above the four to five days terminal operators on North America’s West Coast say they can live with in order to keep rail dwells at their facilities manageable.

Infor Nexus pegged March rail dwells at seven days, down from nearly 10 days in February.

Vancouver’s dwell times have been above five days since last November.

Importers in Canada and the US say rail congestion at Vancouver is a given during the peak shipping season in August through October, when the port and inland rail networks must handle greater volumes than they are designed to handle. But Vancouver has struggled with extended rail dwells over the past several months, well beyond the end of the traditional peak season.

A forwarder said it has taken him as long as 30 days to retrieve some of his containers from Vancouver, saying whether it’s a weather event or labor action or a peak season surge in imports, excessive rail container dwell times are a condition he’s come to expect at the port, calling it “business as usual.”

Stakeholders, however, say they see signs of improvement.

A spokesperson for Canadian Pacific Kansas City Southern (CPKC) said its rail container dwell times are improving at the Vanterm and Centerm terminals in Vancouver. According to the port’s website, CPKC’s rail container dwell at Vanterm on Monday was three to five days, with the average Centerm dwell at zero to three days. Still, CPKC’s dwells were seven days or longer at the Deltaport terminal.

“Driven by dwell improvements at Centerm and Vanterm terminals, we are seeing elevated volumes that we are now moving with improved network and overall supply chain performance following weeks of sustained extreme winter temperatures that impacted operations across the Canadian supply chain,” the CPKC spokesman said.

CN is targeting later this spring for a return to normal at its operations.

“Assuming no further weather impacts, CN anticipates the trend line for container dwell to continue downward through the early spring, getting back to more normal dwell times by mid-late spring,” the CN spokesperson said.

The Vancouver spokesperson said as April progresses, rail business is returning to seasonal norms, “with on-dock volumes and dwell times both trending positively.”

Source: JOC

Trump announces 10% across-the-board tariffs on all US imports

President Donald Trump on Wednesday said the US will assess a minimum 10% tariff on all imports into the US, although countries the Trump administration views as having an unfair trade imbalance with the US will be hit with much higher levies.

The so-called “reciprocal” tariffs that Trump unveiled Wednesday will be equivalent to half of what the US calculates each individual country imposes, through tariffs and non-tariff barriers, on US exports.

The tariffs vary by country and will go into effect in two stages between April 5 and April 9. Products from countries hit with the baseline 10% tariff will be impacted from April 5, while products from individual countries with specific reciprocal tariffs will be affected from April 9.

Imports from China, for example, will be set at 34%, the European Union at 20% and Vietnam at 46%.

Other tariff levels announced Wednesday are 26% on goods from India, 25% on South Korea and 36% on Thailand. Most South American nations will see a 10% tariff on their exports to the US.

Canada and Mexico have already been hit with 25% tariffs that went into effect Wednesday.

Details please refer to the JOC news.

Source: JOC

April blank sailings ramp up amid push to finalize long-term contracts

Ocean carriers plan to blank more sailings through much of April as freight rates hit new lows for 2025 and more ships are expected to hit the water in the coming months. The withdrawal of capacity also comes as ocean carriers look to finalize annual service contracts with shippers.

A total of 68 sailings globally are expected to be canceled during April, according to maritime consultancy Drewry, with about half of the cancellations in trans-Pacific services. The blankings are occurring across a variety of weekly services to major US ports.

Mediterranean Shipping Co. last week said it would blank six voyages between Asia and the US, with most of the cancellations for sailings originally scheduled for the second half of April. MSC said it would cancel late-April voyages scheduled to the US West Coast on both its Orient service from northern China and its Pearl service from Vietnam and southern China.

MSC will also cancel a weekly sailing on its Empire and America services to the US East Coast and another sailing on its Lone Star Express service to the US Gulf Coast.

Schedules from other carriers also show more capacity being withdrawn in the coming weeks. Ocean Network Express’ (ONE’s) export schedule for Shanghai shows the Premier Alliance will have no vessels for mid-April sailings on both its EC1 service to the US East Coast and the EC2 service calling the Port of Manzanillo in Mexico and the US Southeast.

ONE also canceled a mid-April sailing on its MS2 service between Asia and the US West Coast and a sailing originally scheduled this week on its PN3 service to the ports of Vancouver and Tacoma.

Ocean Alliance member Cosco Shipping also appears to be removing trans-Pacific capacity in the short term. It has no weekly voyage scheduled in the second week of April for its Manhattan Bridge service to the US East Coast. The carrier’s Bohai and Hibiscus Express services to the US West Coast also do not have vessels scheduled for the same week.

Details please refer to the JOC news.

Source: JOC

Key Mexican container ports facing delays amid calls by larger vessels

The Mexican Pacific ports of Lazaro Cardenas and Manzanillo are experiencing delays of up to five days as they face operational challenges caused by bigger ships calling the gateways.

“A couple of years ago, the biggest ship arriving in Mexico was about 10,000 TEUs,” said Nicolas Portenza, president of Eternity International Freight Forwarder México. “Now you have Maersk, MSC [Mediterranean Shipping Company] and CMA CGM arriving with vessels between 12,000 TEUs and 16,000 TEUs to a port that is the same size.”

 

“I think it will recover during April and May,” Portenza told the Journal of Commerce. “Demand is not weak per se, it’s just not keeping up with the [vessel] supply.”

Still, industry sources are paying attention to talk of even more capacity to come serving Central America and the West Coast of South America (WCSA).

“There is news of new services to Mexico and also to WCSA,” said a forwarder source with cargo on the lane. “It will be a bloodbath if they come.”

Decreasing blank sailings

Meanwhile, the Asia to West Coast South America and Central America lane is positioned for fewer blanks in April as forwarders report green shoots of demand, although it may not be enough to offset the increased vessel sizes and excess capacity.

eeSea as of Monday reports that no blanks are forecast on the lane in April, down from 12 blank sailings in March that accounted for about 12.2% of the total capacity for WCSA imports from Asia. March marked the highest number of blank sailings observed on the trade since September, a likely response to several capacity injections on the lane in the past several months.

According to Eternity International, the Asia to Mexico lane had a total of five blank sailings spread among four carriers in March, although that is expected to drop to three blanks in April, all from Cosco.

Source: JOC

New alliance vessel plans add to ongoing port congestion in Europe

Severe congestion continues to plague ports across Europe with new alliance vessel plans combining with strikes, bad weather and fully occupied container yards to delay ships and disrupt terminal operations.

The bottlenecks are being felt in both North Europe and the Mediterranean, with carriers, terminals and forwarders reporting lengthy delays in some ports.

Maersk said in its latest Europe advisory that all terminals in Antwerp were congested “due to the phase-in and phase-out of vessel plans,” a factor that was being exacerbated by late vessel arrivals from delays in previous ports.

 

French unions are holding four-hour stoppages in Le Havre on eight separate days in March, in addition to a three-day strike planned this week from March 18–20. Significant disruption is already being experienced from the rolling industrial action, and the full-day strikes are set to bring container operations in France to a standstill this week.

Spillover effects of the Le Havre strike are also affecting Rotterdam, according to HMM, which said the average berth waiting time at Europe’s largest container port was 5.6 days.

 

At Rotterdam’s ECT Euromax terminal, Hutchison Ports has announced that container stacks are so high it will not be able to accept empty containers delivered by road ​​from March 23 “to prevent an unworkable situation.”

The port bottlenecks are also impacting inland connections from Rotterdam and nearby Antwerp. Intermodal operator Contargo on Monday reported average waiting times for the handling of its barges have reached 75 hours in Antwerp and 72 hours in Rotterdam.

Adding to the port congestion issues are seasonal low water levels in the Rhine River that restrict the loading of containers for inland destinations and are generating surcharges of about €50 ($54) per box. The low-water surcharges will rise as water levels drop further through the summer, with shifting cargo putting pressure on road and rail services.

In the Mediterranean, HMM noted that the Greek hub of Piraeus has a berth waiting time of 4.4 days and six days for feeder vessels, while average berth wait times at Genoa and La Spezia were four days.

Details please refer to the JOC news

Source:

Knowler, G. (2025b, March 17). New Alliance vessel plans add to ongoing port congestion in Europe. Journal of Commerce. https://www.joc.com/article/new-alliance-vessel-plans-add-to-ongoing-port-congestion-in-europe-5963964

Proposed US tax on Chinese ship calls could pressure intermodal networks

If a Trump administration proposal to tax Chinese-built and -operated ships calling at US ports is enacted, the nation’s Class I railroads could face the challenge of attempting to move cargo through fewer entry points without disrupting service, railroad executives said Tuesday.

Executives from CSX Transportation and Union Pacific Railroad (UP), speaking at the J.P. Morgan Industrials Conference, said while they could accommodate a shift toward larger ports, it would not come without “significant” disruption.

“Certainly, this potential port fee that could come into play would have a significant disruptive impact,” said CSX CFO Sean Pelkey. “If there’s more consolidation at ports that we serve and there’s more volume that wants to come into those ports, that’s a good thing. We can be a part of the solution for that. But it could also result in more congestion as well, which could have significant disruptive effects.”

Congestion on the rail network is a key concern.

During last year’s peak shipping season, service disruptions on the US West Coast coincided with double-digit percentage growth in cargo volume. In October, 795 of UP’s loaded intermodal railcars sat idle for at least 48 hours, according to the US Surface Transportation Board. That same month, UP’s average intermodal train speed fell to 27.9 miles per hour during the week of Oct. 9–16, its slowest week since 2019.

Mediterranean Shipping Co. CEO Soren Toft said at TPM25 last week that it would no longer be economically viable for carriers to call smaller US ports if the Trump plan was implemented, something echoed by UP CEO Jennifer Hamann.

Details please refer to the JOC news.

Source:

Ashe, A. (2025, March 11). Proposed US tax on Chinese ship calls could pressure intermodal networks. Journal of Commerce. https://www.joc.com/article/proposed-us-tax-on-chinese-ship-calls-could-pressure-intermodal-networks-5960849

Houthi militants threaten to restart attacks on Red Sea shipping

Houthi militants have threatened to resume attacks on merchant shipping in the Red Sea by midweek unless Israel resumes humanitarian aid and electricity supplies to Gaza that were cut earlier this month.

Speaking during a televised address on March 8, Houthi leader Abdul-Malik Al-Houthi set a four-day deadline for Israel to lift a blockade on aid deliveries into Gaza — which have been halted since March 2 — after which time the Houthis would “resume our naval operations against the Israeli enemy.”

The Houthis had paused attacks on international shipping and on Israel on Jan. 19, except for vessels wholly owned by Israeli individuals and/or sailing under the Israeli flag, in line with the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza that expired on March 1 without being extended or progressing to its proposed second stage.

 

The threat underscores the fragility of the Red Sea security situation and the reluctance of ocean carriers to resume Suez Canal transits until the safety of crew, ships and cargo can be guaranteed. Carriers have been diverting vessels around southern Africa since the Houthi attacks on shipping began 15 months ago.

“It has to be safe, and right now it is not safe,” Soren Toft, CEO of Mediterranean Shipping Co. (MSC), told TPM25.

“It is all linked to a number of agreements in the Middle East that are still being discussed, so for us there will be no immediate return to the Red Sea,” Toft added. “Could it happen next month, two months, six months? I don’t know. Eventually it will happen.”

Details please refer to the JOC news.

Source:

Knowler, G. (2025, March 10). Houthi militants threaten to restart attacks on Red Sea Shipping. Journal of Commerce. https://www.joc.com/article/houthi-militants-threaten-to-restart-attacks-on-red-sea-shipping-5959250