Carriers to deploy ‘extra-loaders’ to Los Angeles-Long Beach amid import surge

Ocean carriers in the eastbound trans-Pacific are scheduled to deploy 28 “extra-loader” vessels to the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach over the next two months in response to heavy import volumes expected to land at the US’ busiest gateway during peak shipping season.

The added capacity — 14 extra loaders at each port — comes amid an anticipated boost in discretionary cargo diverted from ports along the US East and Gulf coasts as shippers protect themselves from potential longshore labor disruption in those regions.

Ports on the US West Coast may also see an uptick in freight diverted from Vancouver considering the rail labor issues north of the border are not fully settled.

“If people are worried about ILA [International Longshoremen’s Association] action, and have the ability to do so, they’ve moved things over to the West Coast,” a freight forwarder told the Journal of Commerce. “By and large though, shippers moved peak [freight] early.”

While those developments are helping to drive more import volumes to the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, the main force behind the cargo surge is the strength of the US economy, especially consumer demand, according to Maersk CEO Vincent Clerc.

“I have been impressed by the resilience of demand,” Clerc said during an interview Tuesday at the naming ceremony for the dual-fuel container ship Alette Maersk in Los Angeles. “I expect continued resilient demand through the end of the year.”

The threat of a strike by the ILA at East and Gulf coast ports when the union’s coastwide contract expires on Sept. 30 will have only “a little bit” to do with the import volumes expected to move through Southern California in the coming months, said Gene Seroka, executive director of the Port of Los Angeles.

“It’s the strength of the US economy” that is by far the main driver of import growth, Seroka said at the Maersk event.

Details please refer to JOC news.

Source:

Mongelluzzo, B. (n.d.). Carriers to deploy “extra-loaders” to Los Angeles-Long Beach amid import surge. Journal of Commerce. https://www.joc.com/article/carriers-to-deploy-extra-loaders-to-los-angeles-long-beach-amid-import-surge-5714861

Rail strike Canada 2024: Latest updates on work stoppage

With Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB)  imposed a binding arbitration, it ordered the rail employees back to work to end the dispute that shut down the country’s two major railways.

Statement update as below:

CPKC: https://www.cpkcr.com/en/media/TCRC-bargaining-updates

CN: https://www.cn.ca/en/news/2024/08/cn-receives-order-of-binding-arbitration

 

Canadian ports, liner operators bracing for rail strike impact

Operations at Canada’s West Coast ports are slowing down vessel operations ahead of a potential rail strike that threatens to strand thousands of intermodal containers at terminals already reaching capacity. The country’s East Coast ports can absorb some cargo, but not for a prolonged work stoppage by Canadian rail workers.

As of late Wednesday, no agreement on a new contract has been reached between Canada’s two Class I railroads and the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference (TCRC), which represents over 9,000 conductors, engineers and other trades. In the absence of a new agreement, Canadian National Railway (CN) and Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) said they would lock out TCRC workers as of Thursday.

A shutdown of the railroads would directly impact Canada’s ports, most of which handle a high percentage of intermodal cargo going into the US. After both railroads started embargoing freight earlier this week, Canada’s major ports and container lines began offering workarounds for shippers and making contingency plans for container backlogs and berth delays.

The Vancouver Fraser Port Authority (VFPA) said in a statement to the Journal of Commerce that ocean carriers are being asked to slow down ships scheduled to arrive at the port to avoid vessel congestion.

Only four ships are at Vancouver’s berths with two vessels waiting to berth, according to the VFPA’s maritime data. Current vessel schedules for Global Container Terminals’ (GCT’s) Deltaport terminal show 20 ships are expected to arrive through Sept. 18. GCT’s Vanterm is expected to receive 11 ships through the same period of time.

Vancouver’s intermodal rail yard is already reaching capacity as measured by dwell time. VFPA data shows that intermodal boxes are sitting for five to seven days on dock, compared with four days in July.

“The impact to the Port of Vancouver will be significant, with approximately two-thirds of all cargo volumes at the port moved by rail, including 90% of international exports,” the VFPA’s statement said. “It took many months to clear the backlog of congestion from the 13-day strike by BC longshore workers in 2023 at the Port of Vancouver, with delayed shipments and overburdened infrastructure struggling to restore normalcy.”

GCT said in a statement to the Journal of Commerce that railcar supply to Vancouver has improved in recent weeks, allowing its Vancouver terminals to work down their backlog. However, GCT said its terminals will start seeing impacts should a strike last longer than a couple of days.

“Our terminals are now fluid, but any rail service outage greater than 48 hours will severely impact the fluidity,” GCT said.

DP World’s Centerm terminal in Vancouver is scheduled for 17 vessel arrivals through mid-September. Its Prince Rupert terminal, which is entirely rail-served, is expected to see 22 ship arrivals through the end of September.

While a potential strike would mean containers cannot be brought into terminals, cargo owners would be permitted to retrieve cargo that reached the destination terminal. For now, any work action would not impact terminal workers who load cargo onto trucks, or the gate operators letting drivers in and out of the terminal. Any cargo en route when a potential strike begins at 12:01 a.m. on Thursday would be held where it is located until the labor dispute is resolved. Part of the wind down in operations includes getting as much cargo to destination terminals on Wednesday or holding the cargo at official crew change locations rather than unsecured locations.

Ocean carriers weigh options

Ocean carriers have yet to completely halt liner services in Canada but are preparing workarounds for a rail strike. Maersk said Wednesday it will still accept bookings to Canadian ports along with inland destinations, but it’s reviewing “contingency actions.”

Hapag-Lloyd said Wednesday it will not take any export bookings from US inland destinations that are routed through Canada. For any intermodal cargo destined for Canadian ports, Hapag-Lloyd said it would provide other workarounds such trucking, subject to a $400 fee and the cost difference for the surface transportation leg.

CMA CGM is telling shippers to expect vessels to be diverted to US ports and plans to halt bookings for inland destinations served by rail, according to a report from ContainerXchange.

A US-based ocean carrier executive told the Journal of Commerce that he expects container lines will have to divert vessels or completely halt bookings to Western Canada because Vancouver and Prince Rupert will not have enough room to store intermodal cargo. Canada’s East Coast ports, however, have room to handle stranded intermodal cargo for about two weeks before they hit capacity.

“West Coast ports are operating at high capacity and have much less flexibility, essentially the ships alongside now at the start of a strike will be the last vessels worked,” the executive said.

The Port of Montreal’s overall container volumes are down slightly this year, providing it with buffer capacity to handle stranded intermodal containers. In addition, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) said in a statement to the Journal of Commerce that it is looking at longer gate hours so more trucks can move intermodal cargo out of its terminals.

However, the MPA said that certain rail-served markets such as Ontario and the greater Toronto region “will face major challenges” if a strike commences.

A spokesperson for the Port of Halifax told the Journal of Commerce that while it is still receiving vessels, it expects “significant impacts if we have a rail service interruption.”

“Rail serves approximately 60% of containerized cargo business at the Port of Halifax,” the spokesperson said. “Canadian gateways have already seen a reduction of volumes due to the uncertainty around rail operations. We encourage all parties to work towards a resolution.”

Customers who use CN and CPKC outside Canada will not be impacted because the engineers and conductors are not TCRC members. Routes such as CPKC’s Mexico Midwest Express, the Falcon Premium between Mexico and Detroit, and CN’s trains between the US Gulf Coast and US Midwest will operate normally.

Source:

Angell, M. (2024b, August 21). Canadian ports, liner operators bracing for rail strike impact. Journal of Commerce. https://www.joc.com/article/canadian-ports-liner-operators-bracing-for-rail-strike-impact-5708554

Canadian rail strike set for Thursday

Canada looks set to be hit by industrial action at its two main freight rail companies from this Thursday as employers and employees made their positions clear over the weekend with no deals in sight over labour agreements.

Canadian National Railway formally notified the Teamsters union in Canada on Sunday that it would start locking out union workers early on Thursday.

“Unless there is an immediate and definite resolution to the labour conflict, CN will have no choice but to continue the phased and progressive shutdown of its network which would culminate in a lockout,” it said in a statement.

“Despite negotiations over the weekend, no meaningful progress has occurred, and the parties remain very far apart.”

Canada’s other main rail operator, Canadian Pacific Kansas City, has already told the Teamsters union it will start locking out members early on Thursday.

The Teamsters also issued a 72-hour strike notice to CPKC late on Sunday.

“Unless parties reach last-minute agreements, a work stoppage will occur at 00:01 on Thursday, August 22,” it said in a statement.

From tomorrow, CPKC has said it will stop all shipments that start in Canada and all shipments originating in the US that are headed for Canada, the railroad said.

CN, meanwhile, has barred container imports from US partner railroads.

Both rail companies’ labour agreements expired at the end of 2023 and talks have been ongoing since.

Both companies have said that their trains running in the US will continue to work.

Details please refer to Splash news.

Source:

Chambers, S. (2024, August 19). Canadian rail strike set for Thursday. Splash247. https://splash247.com/canadian-rail-strike-set-for-thursday/

Ottawa rejects call to head off Canada rail work stoppage

The decision by Canada’s labor minister to not intervene in contract talks between the country’s Class I railroads and unions has upped the risk of a work stoppage within the next week, and both railroads have stopped accepting containerized freight in response.

Labor Minister Steve MacKinnon declined a request by Canadian National Railway (CN) to invoke a labor law the railroad had argued would “secure industrial peace” in contract talks with Teamsters Canada Rail Conference (TCRC), his office said in a letter sent Thursday.

CN made the request in early August, asking MacKinnon to force both sides to accept an agreement negotiated through binding arbitration because the union “has not engaged meaningfully at the negotiating table.”

In the letter, MacKinnon’s office said it’s up CN to bargain with the union, but that Canada’s mediation services would be able to help.

“It is your shared responsibility — Canadian National Railway Company and the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference — to negotiate in good faith and work diligently towards a new collective agreement,” the ministry wrote.

In November 2022, US President Joe Biden intervened to prevent a nationwide strike by union rail workers and brokered a tentative deal that was eventually approved by rank-and-file.

Phasing shutdowns

In response to the letter, CN said Thursday it has begun a phased shutdown of its Canadian network, adding that if no deal is struck with TCRC, it will lock out employees on Aug. 22. CN continued to argue that binding arbitration is necessary because it has made four offers to TCRC since January without a counteroffer.

“A prolonged shutdown of rail operations will have a significant impact on supply chains: creating delays, possible shortages and increasing costs,” CN said in a statement. Earlier this week, the railroad informed shippers that it would not be accepting new loads of hazardous materials.

On Friday, CN will extend the embargo to include intermodal cargo from several origins and destinations. That includes dry containers going from or to the ports of New York and New Jersey and Philadelphia, containers it interchanges with CSX Transportation that originate in the Ohio Valley, interchange cargo with Norfolk Southern Railway to the US West and East Coasts, and its joint Canada-US-Mexico service with Union Pacific and Ferromex.

The potential lockout would come just 13 days after the Canadian Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) issued a decision that railroad services would not be considered essential to public safety and health.

Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) on Thursday likewise said it will lock employees out on Aug. 22 if a deal is not reached. CPKC also said it would stop accepting new shipments of hazardous materials, though it will allow non-hazardous intermodal containers to be brought to its terminals until those facilities are full.

The largest impact of a lockout would likely be seen at the Port of Vancouver, Canada’s busiest container port, Scott Shannon, vice president of CH Robinson, told the Journal of Commerce. He said Vancouver already has a backlog of roughly 13,000 intermodal containers from previous rail slowdowns due to a port strike and wildfires in 2023 that disrupted train service.

Ships coming into Vancouver should still be able to discharge, and shippers should be able to transload freight to trucks, Shannon noted. However, he warned that if containers are not retrieved from Vancouver’s terminals in a timely manner, the port will become congested quickly given the absence of regular train service.

“The rail ramps there have been almost continually congested since the summer of 2023,” Shannon said. “Vancouver just hasn’t been able to catch a break or catch up.”

The Port of Prince Rupert receives the vast majority of its cargoes via CN.

Source:

Angell, M. (2024, August 15). Ottawa rejects call to head off Canada rail work stoppage. Journal of Commerce. https://www.joc.com/article/ottawa-rejects-call-head-canada-rail-work-stoppage_20240815.html

Ningbo explosion closes port, adds to worsening Asian bottlenecks

Ocean schedules on the main trade lanes out of Asia are set to deteriorate further in the coming weeks following the huge explosion aboard a Yang Ming vessel Friday that closed the Chinese export hub of Ningbo.

The port has been closed “until further notice,” according to Hapag-Lloyd. That will pile pressure on container shipping supply chains still struggling to catch up on disrupted schedules after Typhoon Gaemi blew through the region at the end of July.

Ningbo was closed following an explosion and fire on board the 6,589-TEU YM Mobility that was berthed at Beilun phase three terminal (NBSCT). The ship is deployed on a joint service called CGX by Yang Ming and Asia Gulf Express 2 (AG2) by partners Hapag-Lloyd and Ocean Network Express (ONE).

“Preliminary findings suggest that an explosion occurred in a container loaded with dangerous goods on board,” Yang Ming Marine Transport said in a statement Friday. The carrier said that according to the shipper declaration, the container was a refrigerated unit being used as a substitute for a dry container without requiring power connection.

“Immediate fire control measures were taken, and the situation is now under control,” the statement said, adding that all crew members were safely evacuated.

A Hapag-Lloyd spokesperson told the Journal of Commerce “the situation is still unclear,” but they had been informed the port will be closed “until further notice.”

“Colleagues are in touch with the terminal trying to get an overview what has happened exactly and how this incident will potentially affect the overall port operations going forward,” the spokesperson said.

Delays at a time of peak demand

What is clear is that the closure of one of China’s busiest container ports will add to the schedule disruption already being felt on the main Asian export trade lanes at a time of peak import demand in the US and Europe.

Hapag-Lloyd said its ships were waiting up to four days to berth at Ningbo before the explosion because of bad weather, with Expeditors putting the pre-explosion dwell time at up to nine days, depending on the terminal.

Berthing delays are also affecting Shanghai, Xiaman, Busan and further south in Hong Kong, Singapore and Port Klang, carriers and forwarders said Friday. Carriers have also added extra loaders to call at Hong Kong to pick up transshipment cargo unloaded early in the rotations due to delays at nearby ports, Hutchison Port Holdings Trust said.

“For export shipments, the average waiting time at China’s major ports is three to seven days. It seems that has become normal,” a spokesperson for Hong Kong-based FIBS Logistics told the Journal of Commerce.

Ningbo is one of the main Asian ports on several services operated by the 2M Alliance of Maersk and Mediterranean Shipping Co., which earlier this week announced rotation changes to Asia-Europe calls amid growing port congestion in both Asia and North Europe.

Ship delays in Asia, combined with the longer voyages around southern Africa to avoid the Red Sea, are contributing to vessel bunching and extending the bottlenecks through to European destination ports.

“As a result of the exceptional waiting time and congestion faced in North Europe, Maersk will reduce the number of North European port calls by consolidating the Antwerp eastbound and westbound call on the AE6 [service] and the Rotterdam calls between both the AE6 and AE55 onto AE55,” the carrier told customers in an advisory this week. Le Havre will be dropped from the AE7 and AE55 services and added to the AE6.

Details please refer to JOC news.

Source:

Knowler, G. (2024, August 9). Ningbo explosion closes port, adds to worsening Asian bottlenecks. Journal of Commerce. https://www.joc.com/article/ningbo-explosion-closes-port-adds-worsening-asian-bottlenecks_20240809.html

Panama Canal transits rise to almost normal levels as expansion work begins

The Panama Canal is looking to increase the number of daily vessel transits to 36 as of September as it seeks to resume normal transit levels in the coming months following robust rainfall levels in June and July.

“Even though there has not been an official announcement to shipping clients, it is very likely that the increase will take place,” a spokesperson for the Panama Canal Authority (ACP) told the Journal of Commerce.

The usual number of transits is between 36 to 38 per day, the spokesperson added, although 40 to 42 vessels can transit in ideal conditions.

The move to increase ship traffic comes as ACP has started talks with some of the Panamanian citizens who will be affected by a $1.6 billion project to expand the canal’s water catchment, including construction of the Río Indio reservoir. The spokesperson confirmed that while the expansion includes construction of the reservoir, the ACP did not rule out the possibility of enlarging the project to include the construction of several smaller reservoirs, which would further guarantee water supplies for both the canal and local residents.

“Currently, the canal has only one multipurpose reservoir planned, in Río Indio,” the ACP spokesperson said. “[But] the Panama Canal administrator [Ricaurte Vásquez Morales] has said that the most important task is to ensure that Panamanians have drinking water. For this, we are considering establishing multipurpose reservoirs to compensate for the water extracted during the canal’s transit operations and for potable water.”

The additional water taken from the Río Indio reservoir will increase the number of canal transits by 11 per day, while also providing extra drinking water.

The ACP confirmed that its personnel have so far talked to more than 800 residents living in over 60 communities.

“Some of the residents have expressed concerns and opposition to the project but also a majority indicates that they are willing to participate in the process if their rights are respected,” the spokesperson said.

Nearly 13,000 inhabitants living in 200 villages in three main settlement areas will be affected by the project, including 2,000 who will be directly affected and face being relocated.

Project completion slated for 2030

The spokesperson said 18 to 24 months will be needed to address social issues related to the expansion and carry out the environmental impact study. ACP estimates construction of a multipurpose reservoir such as Río Indio will take approximately four years from awarding a construction contract. That means construction of the reservoir, associated water pipelines and related infrastructure, including roads and power supplies, is slated for 2026 with completion in 2030.

The ACP spokesperson said the US Army Corps of Engineers is providing ongoing technical assistance, which includes engineering services and overall analysis of the project.

The expansion is intended to guarantee water supplies in the face of increasingly unpredictable rainfall and climate conditions. ACP has made the project a top priority after Panama experienced its second-driest year on record in 2023, which forced the canal to sharply cut the number of daily transits and impose draft restrictions on vessels.

The subsequent congestion led to a trail of approximately 100 ships waiting to pass through the canal last August and led operators to divert vessels around southern Africa to avoid lengthy waits and expensive transit slot costs. The low point was reached last November when only 25 transits per day were allowed, although heavy rainfall in the winter months led to an easing of the restrictions.

Source:

Wallis, K. (2024, August 1). Panama Canal transits rise to almost normal levels as expansion work begins. Journal of Commerce. https://www.joc.com/article/panama-canal-transits-rise-almost-normal-levels-expansion-work-begins_20240801.html

 

Canadian longshore foremen prep for possible strike after DP World hearing

Longshore foremen at the Ports of Vancouver and Prince Rupert are preparing a strike vote, with the results to be announced after Canada’s labor tribunal adjudicates an ongoing dispute between the foremen’s union and maritime employers about staffing levels at the DP World container terminal in Vancouver.

The British Columbia Maritime Employers Association (BCMEA) said in a statement Friday that Local 514 of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) “would be conducting an industry-wide strike vote in the coming weeks.”

The BCMEA said the strike vote comes as Local 514 awaits a hearing before the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) about a union proposal on staffing levels at DP World Centerm.

The CIRB hearing is scheduled for August 6 through 9, at the end of which the union will release the results of the strike vote. If authorized, Local 514 will then provide a 72-hour notice of intent to strike.

What’s not clear is what would happen if CIRB rules in favor of the union and then the results of the Local 514 vote call for a strike.

Local 514 has sought to negotiate a separate contract with DP World about foremen staffing and work rules at Centerm following the installation of remotely operated rail-mounted gantry cranes at the facility. The BCMEA’s position has been that a separate contract with one maritime employer violates the collective bargaining agreement that covers all maritime employers.

The union, which represents 730 longshore foremen throughout Vancouver and Prince Rupert, voted to authorize a strike solely against DP World in early July following the terminal’s refusal to bargain separately with the union. However, the CIRB ruled that the union could not vote to authorize a strike against a single terminal.

“While regrettable, ILWU Local 514’s decision to proceed with an industry-wide strike vote is predictable, given the CIRB’s decision which deemed the union’s previous strike vote and related strike notice to DP World illegal,” the BCMEA said.

The BCMEA and Local 514 have been in talks for a new four-year collective bargaining agreement since the expiration of the last contract in March 2023. But maritime employers say the union’s dispute with DP World has stalled those talks. The BCMEA said it has offered a 19.2% wage increase for longshore foremen over the contract’s term.

Source:

Angell, M. (2024b, July 29). Canadian longshore foremen prep for possible strike after DP world hearing. Journal of Commerce. https://www.joc.com/article/canadian-longshore-foremen-prep-possible-strike-after-dp-world-hearing_20240729.html