No immediate relief seen for Canada’s rail problems

A lack of drayage capacity in Toronto and Montreal for receiving cargo from Prince Rupert and Vancouver is increasingly putting upstream pressure on the West Coast ports, keeping rail dwells elevated at marine terminals and slowing the inland movement of Asian imports.

Vancouver has been grappling with persistent bouts of congestion since last summer due to a series of mishaps — wildfires and flooding that crippled road and rail infrastructure in British Columbia, and sub-freezing temperatures this winter that compounded the rail problems. Cargo flow through Prince Rupert has been relatively smoother. In addition to serving markets in eastern Canada, the ports also serve as gateways for US-bound cargo.

Cargo volumes this year highlight the fact that inland bottlenecks, not container volumes, are the cause of the ports’ woes. Vancouver’s container volume was down 13.7 percent in January through May from the year-ago period, according to the port. Prince Rupert data shows the port’s volume was up 1 percent through the first five months of the year.

“Rail dwell is challenging across the port due to capacity constraints in the network and inland terminals, and this is not isolated to terminals within the Port of Vancouver,” GCT Canada, which operates the Deltaport and Vanterm terminals in Vancouver, told JOC.com in a statement.

The congestion at rail hubs in eastern Canada is a direct result of drayage capacity shortages at those facilities. “It’s an on-going situation with both railroads (Canadian Pacific and Canadian National),” said Julia Kuzeljevich, public affairs manager at the Canadian International Freight Forwarders Association (CIFFA).

“There are fewer drivers in Toronto to handle the volume, creating a backlog/congestion issue. On a YTD basis, total truck visits declined by 18.5 percent,” CIFFA said in a bulletin to its membership. CIFFA noted that the drayage problem, which first surfaced in Toronto in May, has extended to Montreal.

Railroad metering cargo

As a result of the congestion at their inland facilities, the railroads are metering, or managing how many trains they are deploying to Vancouver and Prince Rupert. This is causing rail containers to back up at the marine terminals because of reduced train capacity. However, the situation at marine terminals is fluid, with rail dwells changing from day to day.

For example, at GCT Deltaport, the largest container terminal in Vancouver, containers for both railroads were dwelling an average of seven days or longer last Tuesday, according to numbers posted on the Port of Vancouver website. The average dwell on Wednesday dropped to five to seven days for CP containers, and three to five days for CN containers. On Thursday, the CP containers were still dwelling five to seven days, but the CN dwells shot back up over seven days, according to the port. Dwells of longer than three days cause congestion problems.

When the container dwells begin to build for one of the railroads, hampering operations, the terminals immediately push more containers to the other railroad because those containers can be vacated more smoothly, which helps to relieve overall congestion at the marine terminal. However, the second railroad’s operations can quickly become overloaded.

Canada’s whiplash

Although the whiplash effect of inland rail congestion on West Coast ports has been pervasive in the US the past year, it has not been a serious problem in Canada until recently.

“It never happened before,” Maksim Mihic, CEO and general manager at DP World Canada, told JOC.com. DP World operates the Centerm and Fraser Surrey Docks terminals in Vancouver and Prince Rupert’s Fairview terminal.

“We’re seeing elevated dwells because of (delays in) Toronto and Montreal,” said Brian Friesen, vice president of trade development and communications at the Port of Prince Rupert. However, DP World two weeks ago opened a near-dock surge yard near the Fairview terminal and has already begun to move containers there for temporary storage, so that timely move should prevent rail congestion at the port from worsening, Friesen said.

Neither the ports nor the railroads are ready to forecast a return to normal. “The drayage and warehouse capacity constraints in Toronto and Montreal have become so chronic that we are now in a situation of a potential back-up for some time until this gets addressed,” CN said in a statement.

CP, which said “heavy volumes” of intermodal cargo are also contributing to excessive container dwells at the ports, adds that the main issue in the supply chain can be traced to long-dwelling containers at the inland rail ramps. “To maintain network efficiency, all participants in the supply chain must work together to pick up and return equipment promptly,” CP said in a statement.

 

PMA-ILWU discussing earlier start times at West Coast terminals

West Coast longshore employers and dockworkers engaged in negotiations for a new contract are discussing a proposal that would allow marine terminals to open their gates at 6 a.m., according to the president of terminal operator SSA Containers. The potential change has the support of truckers who work the ports, saying it would add an hour to what they consider the most productive time of the day.

Allowing the so-called “double-flex” gates is not a controversial issue, said Ed DeNike, president of SSA Containers, who referenced the extended gate proposal at the JOC Port Performance webcast Tuesday. It’s just a matter of working out the details during the ongoing coastwide contract negotiations in San Francisco between the International Longshore & Warehouse Union (ILWU) and the Pacific Maritime Association (PMA), he said.

“It’s not possible under the current contract. We can flex at 7 a.m. Maybe there’s a chance to flex at 6 a.m.,” DeNike said. SSA Marine operates container terminals in Seattle, Oakland, and Long Beach.

Harbor truckers say getting earlier access each day to containers would fit in nicely with the schedules of truckers, shippers, and warehouses. “The expanded hours would definitely help,” Matt Schrap, CEO of the Harbor Trucking Association, told JOC.com Wednesday. “We’ve wanted this for some time.”

The long-standing work shifts, as specified in the current coastwide contract that expires July 1, are 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., 6 p.m. to 3 a.m., and the late night “hoot” shift from 3 a.m. to 8 a.m. The contract also allows terminals to “flex” the start times one hour early, but not by two hours. Longshoremen by contract provisions earn overtime pay whenever they start early.

Warehouses and truckers say the early-morning hours fit best into their operations. “The earlier the better,” said Scott Weiss, vice president technical sales at Performance Team, which operates warehouses throughout the country.

 ‘Big line of trucks’ for 7 a.m. start

In order to open their gates at 6 a.m. without the double-flex provision, terminals would have to run the entire hoot shift from 3 a.m. to 8 a.m., which is quite costly, as longshoremen on that shift are paid for eight hours of work for five hours on the job. The ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, at the urging of the White House port productivity task force, have experimented sporadically with hoot shifts since last fall.

Terminals that have experimented with the hoot shifts said they generated little, if any, truck traffic because most warehouses in Southern California do not operate on a 24/7 basis. However, DeNike said trucks begin lining up at 6 a.m. each morning at SSA-operated terminals awaiting the opening of the 7 a.m. flex gate. “It’s quite a big line of trucks,” he said.

Schrap said that in order to make the 6 a.m. gates truly beneficial for truckers, all 12 container terminals in Los Angeles-Long Beach should open at that time so drivers can build those gates hours into their schedules. “The most important thing is consistency throughout the harbor,” he said.

The PMA and ILWU have a media blackout during the negotiations and do not answer questions on specific issues under discussion.